Saturday, May 18, 2013

GOLD Weekend update

From Nifty Charts

GOLD Weekend update:
  • Gold bears extending gains below 200 Week SMA. Crucial support at 1321 if gets tested price could fall towards 1250 levels as shown in the second chart with Weekly range.
  • For gold bulls 1321 should be held to avoid another fall. 
  • Hourly chart is trending down below the cloud. Possible reversal of the trend will be possible only if price starts to trade above the cloud.
  • APPLE WEEKEND UPDATE
-->

Friday, May 17, 2013

New Information

Am including a list of what we own now and at what price bought. Also, I'm expanding the list of what we are following. The table below is what own, which I will publish whenever there are changes.


DUST 118.72--+13.13--+12.43%--82.92--700--$83,104--$58,044--+$25,060
UGAZ 29.42-- +2.3 -- 8.48% -- 26.76 -- 1000 -- $29,420 -- $26,760 -- +$2,660
DSLV 56.97--+3.82--7.19% --23.4-- 10,000 $569,700-- $234,000-- +$335,700
EWV 18.02-- -.54 -- -2.91% -- 18.15 -- 500 -- $9,010-- $9,075 -$65
TVIX 2.52-- -.139 -- -5.23% -- 5.88 --16,956-- $42,729--$99,701-- -$56,972
INDL 20.97-- +.35 -- +1.7% -- 18.35-- 500 -- $10,485-- $9,175 +$1,310
TMV 55.94-- +1.95-- +3.61% -- 48.87-- 600 -- $33,564-- $29,322 +$4,242
YINN 18.63-- +.38-- +2.08% -- 15.56 -- 500 -- $9,315 -- $7,780 +$1,535
Cost Basis: $473,857 Current Value: $787,327 Gain/Loss: +$313,470.

Here is the expanded list of what we are following but have not bought.

NRP closed up today 1.54%--NRGY up 1.58%--BWP up 1.17%--FXI up .99%--PGJ up .72%--EPD up .93%--CHIQ up .69%--BPL up .58%--CQQQ up .35%--ECNS up .49%--EEM up .44%--EPP up .02%

NLY down .02%--DRV down 1.49%--TECS down 3.13%--TZA down 3.33%--FAZ down 3.87%

Nothing has changed in my mind from yesterday about this market. I bought EWV today because Nekkei's DSI was 95% recently--that's bullish sentiment. I am looking for a complete collapse of precious metals, more rise in natural gas, and a bull market in India and China.

Take care. More later.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Soros still dumping

Gold ETF Assets Plunge as Soros Dumps GLD Holdings
Nearly 180 metric tons of bullion flowed out of gold ETFs in the first quarter as notable investors including George Soros dumped their positions in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and other precious metal funds amid a pullback in prices.

Buy $EWV

Initiating a buy on EWV

Visit StockCharts.com to see more great charts.

Which closed up today 2.54%--FAZ up 1.75%--DRV up 1.43%--TVIX up 1.49%--another new buy today ECNS (It's less than two pennies from a 52 week high) up .83%--TZA up .76%.

INDL closed down today .1%--NRGY down .21%--EEM down .36%--EPP down 1.01%--DUST down 1.04%--YINN down 1.3%--BWP down 1.38%--TECS down 1.56%--DSLV down 2.42%--TMV down 3.14%--UGAZ down 9.42%.

In the last couple of months Market Vane's Bullish Consensus had 70% twice.  The last time we had that was the first half of 2007.  Will it happen again?  Of course.

Looking forward to tomorrow.  Best of luck.
 

Japan's Kamikaze Easing

US Dollar Collapse and Japan’s Sham Currency War: The Hidden Agenda Behind Japan’s Kamikaze Quantitative Easing
By Matthias Chang
Global Research, May 15, 2013
Url of this article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-dollar-collapse-and-japans-sham-currency-war-the-hidden-agenda-behind-japans-kamikaze-quantitative-easing/5335129


US$ dollars have been flooding the financial markets ever since Bernanke launched quantitative easing allegedly to turnaround the US economy. These huge amounts of US$ toilet paper are mainly in financial markets (and in central banks) outside of the United States. A huge chunk is represented as reserves in central banks led by China and Japan.

If truth be told, the real value of the US$ would not be more than a dime and I am being really generous here, as even toilet paper has a value.

That the US dollar is still accepted in the financial markets (specifically by central banks) has nothing to do with it being a reserve currency, but rather that the US$ is backed/supported by the armed might and nuclear blackmail of the US Military-Industrial Complex. The nuclear blackmail of Iran is the best example following Iran’s decision to trade her crude in other currencies and gold instead of the US$ toilet paper.

If the United States were not a military threat and a global bully that can blackmail with impunity the oil exporting countries in the Middle East, the global financial system which hinges on the US$ toilet paper would have collapsed a long time ago.

The issue is why has the US$ not collapsed as it should have by now?
When we apply common sense and logic to the state of affairs, the answer is so simple and it is staring at you.

But, you have not been able to see the obvious because the global mass media, specifically the global financial mass media controlled mainly from London and New York, has created a smokescreen to hide the truth from you.

Let’s analyse the situation in a step by step manner, and apply common sense.

1. The US is the world’s biggest debtor. The biggest creditors are China and Japan, followed by the oil exporting countries in the Middle East. With each passing day, the value of the US$ toilet paper is worth less and less. Like I said earlier, even toilet paper has some intrinsic value. It reaches zero value when everyone has to carry a wheelbarrow of US$ to purchase anything.

2. For the US$ toilet paper creditors, they cannot admit the fact that they have been conned by the global Too Big To Fail Banks (TBTFs) acting in concert with the FED and the Bank of England to accept US$ toilet papers. The central bankers of these countries have a reputation to preserve (not that there is in fact any reputation, for their so-called financial credibility is also part of the scam) and the political leaders that relied on them is in a bigger bind. How can the political leaders be so very stupid to trust these central bankers (who have stashed away in foreign tax havens huge US$ toilet papers as a reward for their complicity). This is the current state of affairs in plain English. They are having sleepless nights worrying if and when the citizens would wise up to this biggest con in history i.e. the promotion and acceptance of fiat currencies, the US$ being the ultimate fiat currency.

3. The global financial elites led by the FED know that this state of affairs is to their advantage and they are exploiting it to the hilt! They also know that no country or organisation has the military resources to threaten the US to stop this global ponzi scheme which has been going on since 1945 and intensified since 1971 when President Nixon de-coupled the US$ from gold. The pound sterling is another story but, it is not relevant for the purposes of this analysis.

4. Additionally, and as a result of the above-stated scam, countries were led to believe and to accept the false economic theory that export generated growth (GDP) should be the foundation of economic development, as the United States having limitless US$ toilet paper has the ability and the means to purchase the global exports, it being the largest consumer market in the world. In the result, the world’s factories and their workers, including those in the developed world such as France and Germany worked their butts off to be rewarded with US$ toilet paper whose value is less than the paper and ink that produce it! The financial frolic went on for more than forty years and came to an abrupt and foreseeable end in the 2008 global financial tsunami.

5. When the party ended, the United States was up to her eyeballs in debts as a result of reckless financial speculation in the global derivatives casino and the consumption binge financed by housing mortgages. Debts must be repaid. But, the US has no means to do so. They cannot produce enough goods to earn the revenue to pay the debts because US manufacturing has been outsourced to the developing world – China became the world’s number 1 factory. So, the financial elite appointed helicopter Bernanke to lead the charge for the US and the UK to use the printing press (digital or otherwise) to print more US$ toilet papers to pay off the debt. In economic jargon, this is “monetising the debt”. It is outright fraud, but no one (i.e. central bankers) in his right mind would admit to this fraud as they would be hung from the lamp-posts if the truth is discovered as was the case when the Italian fascist leader Mussolini was hung by the Italian partisans.

6. Initially, central bankers confronted with this situation and having to face a restless populace embarked on a regime of competitive easing/ devaluation of their currencies. But, the price was horrendous. Inflation spiked in all these countries. But, this scheme of things did not work out as planned for the simple reason, the US$ toilet paper continued to be lower as a result of more QE by Bernanke. China realised the danger and adopted other means to overcome this situation, one of which was to enter into bilateral arrangements with her trading partners to finance trade in their respective currencies. Such agreements were entered between China and Japan, members of BRIC, Malaysia etc. This counter-measure was perceived as a threat to the continued dominance of the US$ toilet paper regime. In the result, Obama declared at the urging of the financial elites (he does not have the grey cells to think) a foreign policy shift – the Asia Pivot to prevent a further deterioration of US$ dominance.

7. When Japan entered the agreement with China, her behaviour was deemed unacceptable since Japan was under the nuclear protection of the US. Japan was caught between a rock and a hard place. It was expected that sooner or later the US would apply the squeeze on Japan to behave in a proper manner. Applying geopolitical strategies, the US towing South Korea along provoked North Korea by launching a military exercise which included flying B-2 bombers which are capable of carrying nuclear weapons. North Korea responded in the manner that was expected. Japan was exposed and in like manner reacted by seeking US protection. To muddy the waters and complicate the situation, the US engineered a Idispute between China and Japan over the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands. This was followed by the installation of a new regime in Japan by the election of the Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and the appointment of Haruhiko Kuroda as the Governor of the Bank of Japan (BOJ).

8. Now comes the mechanics of US counter-measures in shoring up the artificial dominance/value of the US$ toilet paper. Japan was ordered to do its part as a quid pro quo for being protected by the US’s nuclear umbrella. A new version of the Plaza Accord must be put in place – a “reverse Plaza Accord”.

9. Let me explain. In the 1985 Plaza Accord, the dollar was devalued to reduce the current account deficit and to help the US recover from the recession of the early 1980s. It was a managed devaluation and the exchange value of the Dollar versus the Yen declined by 51 per cent from 1985 to 1987 – reaching ¥151 per US$1 in March 1987. The dollar continued to slide till 1988. The effect of the strengthened Yen depressed Japan’s exports and brought about the expansionary monetary policies that resulted in the infamous asset bubbles of the late 1980s. The G-6 countries then gathered in 1987 in Paris to arrest the slide of the dollar and to manage and stabilise the international currency markets. The end result was the Louvre Accord. In the next 18 months the dollar strengthened to ¥160 per US$1.

10. However, in the current situation, the devaluation of the US$ toilet paper was the result of massive QEs so as to enable US to monetise her debts. However, for US to continue to monetise her debts and have the world’s central banks agreement to continue to hold dollar reserves, the value of the dollar must appreciate, failing which the dollar would collapse, the US defaulting on her debts, as creditors would no longer accept US$ as payment. The trick was to artificially inflate the value of the dollar without arousing any suspicions.

11. In the 1970s, following the de-coupling of the dollar from gold by President Nixon, the dollar would have collapsed in like manner as it was not backed by gold. It became pure fiat money! The trick then was to create an artificial demand for dollar which would in turn raise the value of the currency. This was effected by the proposal of Kissinger to the Arabs that if they would dollarize their oil exports, the US would guarantee their safety and survival even from the threats of Israel. When the Arabs agreed to this arrangement, every country in the world had to buy oil in US$. Countries have to exchange their currencies into US$ to buy oil. This demand for US$ strengthened the currency and prolonged the US fiat money monopoly.

12. However, this option is no longer available presently as oil is now being sold in other currencies besides the US$. The petro-dollar is no longer in dominance. In any event, the continued use of petro-dollars would spike the oil price and this would be inflationary and detrimental to the US economy as well as the world’s economy in the present economic climate – i.e. deep recession. Another means must be used.

13. This is the reason for the sudden “shock and awe” monetary policy of the new Japanese regime of Shinzo Abe and Haruhiko Kuroda. My detractors will accuse me of indulging in conspiracy theories. But, the facts speak for themselves. I had said earlier, that the G-7 countries have collectively attempted to devalue their currencies but, it did not stem the slide of the US$ because Bernanke was increasing the intensity of QE since 2008. And the EU was not willing and or able to adopt a suicide policy of massive QE as Germany was well aware of such a risk having suffered the negative effects of hyperinflation. China would not kow-tow to the US and in fact together with fellow members of BRIC was adopting counter-measures to confront Bernanke’s QE financial weapon. That left only one country who can be compelled to do the US bidding, to commit Hara-kiri to save and or prolong the US$ toilet paper regime – Japan!

14. And so, Japan launched its sudden massive QE and the desired effect is that now the US$ toilet paper has artificially appreciated in value vis-a-vis the Yen and less so with other currencies. This cannot be disputed by my detractors because:
On May 11, the financial elites of G-7 countries explicitly agreed with this kamikaze policy of Japan.

Koichi Hamada has also declared earlier that the target for this policy is to allow the dollar to rise to ¥110 per US$1 and this rise would be managed in a staggered fashion in small increments (step by step approach) thereby controlling the rate of inflation in Japan which would not be allowed to exceed the agreed target rate.

It is suggested that Japan can do this because it can utilise its huge dollar reserves of US$1.2 Trillion to manage the devaluation! According to Alan Ruskin, the global head of Group of 10 foreign-exchange strategy in New York at Deutsche Bank ASG, he said “I think we are opening up the door to look at 105 in the next few months and 110 by the end of the year ...” and this surely must be interpreted to mean that Koichi Hamada’s strategy is definitely in play.

In conclusion, it is my view that such “managed artificial appreciation” of the US$ toilet paper while effective in the short run would fail in the long run because the fundamental issues of the US economy have not been addressed and resolved. Only real economic growth can reverse the dollar’s demise.

Seriously, would Bernanke stop further QE when the yen exchange rate reaches ¥110 by the year end? Has not Bernanke declared that QE would continue till 2015? And since Japan has drawn the Red Line at ¥110, can Japan risk further damage to its economy and continue to back-stop US beyond ¥110?
The US$ quadrillion derivative casino is the millstone around the US and the global economy, and as long as this is not resolved, the crisis would only get worse. Like water, after sufficient heat, the boiling point would be reached.

While I cannot forecast the precise date of the implosion, I am of the view that the end is near, sparked by a black swan event and then snowballed to its final devastation.

Copyright © 2013 Global Research

Time for $TVIX

10:10 AM More on Philly Fed: The big miss is another in a line of weak data points this morning. The decline was led by a steep drop in shipments to -8.5 from +9.1. Also notable is a big jump in inventories to +4.1 from -22.2. Employment worsened to -8.7 from -6.7. The percentage of firms reporting employment decreases was 22% vs. those reporting increases at 14% - a number sure to cross the desk of the FOMC doves this morning. Treasurys have had a tough May, but they're bouncing today, TLT +1.2%. The leveraged bear ETF: TBT -2.4%. Stocks give up early gains (DIA -0.2%).

$UGAZ and $DUST and $DSLV

Buy more UGAZ and DUST and DSLV

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Breakout in Japanese 10-Year Bond Yield

From Mish

Breakout in Japanese 10-Year Bond Yield: Curve Watchers Anonymous has its eye on global interest rates. For example, please consider this chart of 10-Year Japanese bonds.



click on chart for sharper image

Chart courtesy of Steen Jakobsen, chief economist at Saxo Bank in Denmark.

I have been paying close attention to Japanese yields in light of this statement by the Bank of Japan chief: "I do not expect a sudden spike in long-term bond yields."

I commented on the statement on Saturday in Expect a Spike in Long-Term Japanese Interest Rates; Currency Crisis Just Around the Corner.

As a Yen-followup, please consider Will Shinzo Abe Succeed with Constitutional Changes to Militarize Japan and Further Destroy the Yen?

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

Another good day for this bear


Visit StockCharts.com to see more great charts.

You see how DUST closed today.  DSLV up 10.98%--INDL up 4.56%--UGAZ up 4.54%--EEP up 1.53%--TVIX up 1.55%--BWP up 1.49%--YINN up 1.26%--EEM up .03%.

NRP down .64%--TZA down .63%--NRGY down .74%--TECS down .86%--TMV down 1.9%--EWV down 2%--FAZ down 2.55%--DRV down 2.61%.

Gold and silver going lower, natural gas higher, interest rates higher, Asia--sans Japan--higher, Japan will break one of these days, as will banking system.  Europe edging toward abyss, and housing will go lower too.

See you tomorrow.
 

Not good for gold

Australian Dollar ETF Tumbles as Soros, Druckenmiller Turn Bearish
CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust (FXA) is down about 6% the past month with noted investors George Soros and Stanley Druckenmiller turning bearish on the commodity-driven currency. “We think the Australian dollar will come down and will come down hard,” Druckenmiller said at last week’s Sohn Investment Conference

Where we stand this afternoon

$DUST up 9.8%--DSLV up 8.49%--INDL up 4.82%--UGAZ up 3.67%--YINN up 2.46%--TVIX up 1.55%--BWP up 1.79%--EEP up 1.4%--NRGY up .78%--EEM up .12%--TMV up .25%.

TECS down .89%--TZA down 1.82%--DRV down 2.13%--EWV down 1.95%--FAZ down 3.06%.

Not bad for all time high--and I'm as bearish as they come.

Until the close.

Precious metals are a little less so

11:16 AM Gold (GLD -2.1%), (IAU -2.2%) sinks back below $1,400 as the bounce since mid-April is officially over. At work here, suggests RBC Capital, is the strong stock market. To participate, foreign investors sell gold, buy dollars (UUP is up big in May), and call their stockbrokers. Commerzbank notes gold ETF outflows were another 6 tons yesterday, bringing the total since early April to 230 tons. Silver (SLV -3.1%) tags along.

Super Mario

Europe: Spreading the Pain
Terminal Velocity, Part 8 by Adam Whitehead, KeySignals.com

Like his former MIT colleague Stanley Fischer, Mario Draghi hinted that their former MIT colleague's "Helicopter" will soon be taking off, in his most recent ECB press conference; but was quick to opine that it won't be flying in Europe[i]. In doing so, he provided more support to the thesis in Terminal Velocity (4)[ii], that "the Eurozone, faced with the prospect of break-up, as the Germans refuse to pick up the tab for fiscal union without a global bank run, provides the lowest fruit on the tree to be picked this summer". Draghi has gone even further than Fischer, by creating the necessary conditions for a fully blown European bank run. He has created these conditions by going one better than Bernanke and moving beyond the "Zero Bound"; to the "Negative Bound", where lenders and depositors pay financial institutions to take their money[iii]. The thought of paying a shaky European bank to take one's deposits, after what happened to depositors in Cyprus, apparently seems like a reasonable quid pro quo to "Super Mario".

Interest rates and housing

Mortgage Applications Fall in Face of Rising Rates
Posted to: MND NewsWire
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 7:43 AM
Forward this email: Send a copy of this story to someone you know that may want to read it.

Applications for both purchasing and refinancing homes dropped during the week ended May 10 as interest rates reversed the downward trend of the previous few weeks. According to the Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey conducted by the Mortgage Bankers Association, the Market Composite Index, a measure of application activity, rose 7.3 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from the week ended May 3 and was up 7 percent on a non-adjusted basis.
The Refinance Index fell 8 percent from the previous week and the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index was down 4 percent.

For FAZ Fans

7:54 AM "You're getting cost cuts as a means of sustaining performance and that's not a great sign," says analyst Simon Maughan. "What HSBC (HBC) is showing you (job cuts earlier) is that there is very little growth in the banking industry (XLF) for years to come." CEO Stuart Gulliver notes HSBC has met its savings target, but hasn't met a goal to reduce costs as a percentage of revenue because revenue hasn't grown.

Nice open this morning

$DSLV opened up 5.82% this morning--DUST up 4.52%--INDL up 4.77%--UGAZ up 3.21%--NRGY up 2.22%--EEP up 1.03%--TVIX up 1.55%--YINN up 1.31%--TZA up .44%--FAZ up .18%--TECS up .18%--DRV up 1.14%.

Interest rates take a breather. Japan was up again last night. Let's see if the VIX can catch on fire. Good morning!

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Another toppy indicator


Visit StockCharts.com to see more great charts.
U.S. Stocks Have Been Climbing. What Does That Mean for India and China?
Sometimes global markets move in tandem, and sometimes they don't.
By Vadim Pokhlebkin
Tue, 14 May 2013 11:30:00 ET

Think back to 2007 and early 2008, before the worst of the financial crisis. Perhaps you recall this major investment belief: Even if the West took a dive, emerging markets would save the day.

But when the crisis hit, emerging markets crashed right along with the developed ones. Still, there were a few important nuances.

For example, the Shanghai Composite index bottomed months ahead of the DJIA in late October 2008, when the Dow was losing 500 points a day. By the time the Dow finally found a bottom four months later (on March 6, 2009) Chinese stocks were well off their lows.

In other words, sometimes global markets move in tandem, and sometimes they don't.

It becomes even clearer when you look at the markets through the prism of Elliott wave analysis. You realize that wave patterns in different markets -- even related ones -- are different. The simple explanation is that Elliott wave patterns reflect social mood, and that mood varies among markets.

What about now? The Dow closed at a record high on Wednesday (May 8). What does that mean for stocks in China and India, Asia's two "economic powerhouses"?

Well, the daily chart of the Shanghai Composite shows that the Chinese stock market has not been sharing the Dow's enthusiasm.

Yet if you look at India's Nifty, the picture is very different.

So even among the emerging markets themselves often there is no consensus. All the more reason to apply Elliott wave analysis to them individually.

Economic news from China and India are not encouraging right now. The Chinese exports are weak, and India's central bank expects a slow economic recovery. That doesn't sound very good for stocks, does it?

Yet before you adopt this conventional point of view, please take a look at what the waves are saying. Using the Elliott Wave Principle's timeless insight that markets are patterned and therefore predictable, EWI's analysts can explain and forecast market action.


Initial Public Offerings of 2013 Meet the Manias of 2007 and 1929

Initial Public Offerings of 2013 Meet the Manias of 2007 and 1929:
How can you tell when stock market optimism has turned "fervent"?  One historically sure sign is that a rush of companies go public. The year 1999 was a perfect example. Large numbers of Internet companies with zero revenue went public. The fervor didn't last, as you may recall. 2007 was also a busy year for IPOs -- and another major market top. Now consider the IPO levels of 2013.

Fed Watch: Plosser on the Exit

From Economist's Views

Fed Watch: Plosser on the Exit:
Tim Duy:
Plosser on the Exit, by Tim Duy: As is well known, policymakers have been coalescing around a QE exit strategy for some time, since at least the March FOMC meeting. Two central issues with the exit are the timing and the communications. Officials do not want to undermine the recovery, knowing full-well that previous flirtations with exits have gone awry. At the same time, however, they fear the cost-benefit analysis may be turning against them. For some doves it is not the potential inflation cost, but the potential financial instability cost. Some policymakers want to begin tapering asset purchases at the next meeting, some are looking to the summer, and others looking to the fall.
Regarding the communications issue, policymakers seem to be taking pains to make clear that the financial markets should not overreact to any one policy move. The tapering process may be smooth, it may be choppy, it may be long, it may be short. It is contingent on the state of the economy, something inherently unknown. Mostly, they want to avoid a 1994-type of miscommunication.
Today's speech by Philadelphia Federal Reserve President Charles Plosser covers nearly all of these elements. In general, although I do not agree with his conclusions regarding timing, I think he makes a what would be viewed by some as a credible argument for tapering to begin sooner than later.
Begin with his base forecast:
My forecast of 3 percent growth should allow for continued improvements in labor market conditions, including a gradual decline in the unemployment rate, similar to the trend we have seen over the past three years, which was a 0.7- to 0.8-percentage point decline per year. Continuing at such a pace would lead to an unemployment rate close to 7 percent at the end of 2013 and a rate below 6.5 percent by the end of 2014.
Indeed, this year we have already seen the unemployment rate fall from 7.9 percent in January to 7.5 percent in April. Employers added 165,000 jobs in April, but the more positive news came in the revisions for February and March. The revised data indicate that firms added 332,000 jobs in February and 138,000 in March. The upward revisions for these two months added 114,000 jobs.
The forecast of a 6.5% unemployment rate by the end of 2014 is important. My thought is that the Fed will want to conclude asset purchases before hitting that target. Moreover, optimally they would like time so that, if necessary, the tapering can be a slow process. That argues for tapering to begin sooner than later. Indeed, Plosser would like asset purchases to end this year:
Based on the stated views of the Committee regarding the flexibility in pace of purchases, I believe that labor market conditions warrant scaling back the pace of purchases as soon as our next meeting. Moreover, unless we see a significant reversal in current trends that jeopardizes my forecast of near 7 percent unemployment rate by the end of this year, then I anticipate that we could end the program before year-end. Let's look at some of the data.
The end of the year is actually fast approaching; if you want to taper off over the course of a hand full of meetings, the calendar is driving you to begin now. Now, back to that data:
In the six months through September 2012, when the decision to initiate the latest open-ended asset purchase program was made, nonfarm payrolls had increased an average of 130,000 per month, and the unemployment rate had averaged 8.1 percent. In the most recent six months, from November 2012 through April 2013, nonfarm payrolls have increased on average 208,000 per month — a 60 percent increase — and the unemployment rate has averaged 7.7 percent. As I noted earlier, April's unemployment rate has now reached 7.5 percent.
Moreover, the average duration of unemployment has fallen, the share of long-term unemployment has dropped, and hours worked and earnings have risen. While further progress would certainly be desirable, I believe the evidence is consistent with a significantly improving labor market. Thus, it is appropriate to begin scaling back the pace of asset purchases.
At this point, I raise my hand and say "But isn't underemployment still too high and being driven by cyclical factors? Aren't you erring on the side of removing stimulus too early?" But that arguement is neither here nor there for Plosser. He has obviously decided these are second-order issues. He does deliver what (I think) is a novel argument for tapering sooner than later:
Indeed, in my view, were the FOMC to refrain from reducing the pace of its purchases in the face of this evidence of improving labor market conditions, it would undermine the credibility of the Committee's statement that the pace of purchases will respond to economic conditions. Similarly, if there were sufficient evidence that conditions in labor markets had deteriorated, I would expect the FOMC to consider increasing the pace of purchases. After all, this is the meaning of state-contingent monetary policymaking. But if we reach the point that markets only expect us to move in one direction — that is, toward more easing — and we become reluctant to dial back on purchases over concerns of disappointing or surprising markets, then we will find ourselves in a very difficult position going forward.
In short, the Fed communicated a particular strategy - one in which the pace of asset purchases would be determined by recovery in the labor market. And, by Plosser's reckoning, the 60% increase in the pace of job growth is evidence of exactly the kind of improvement the Fed was looking to achieve.
Notice that Plosser is not appealing to a fear that the Fed's credibility on inflation is at risk. Instead, not acting to slow asset purchases undermines the credibility of the Fed's communications strategy. This is an argument that might resonate with other policymakers who are already worried that financial markets will misinterpret future policy actions. I suspect Plosser knows inflation concerns are likely to fall on deaf ears. Indeed, he addresses the inflation topic earlier in the speech:
Should inflation expectations begin to fall, we might need to take action to defend our inflation goal, but at this point, I do not see inflation or deflation as a serious threat in the near term. However, I do believe that our extraordinary level of monetary accommodation will have to be scaled back, perhaps more aggressively than some think, to ensure that inflation over the medium term remains consistent with our target.
Convincing others to pull back on easing due to inflation concerns is something of a challenge when your preferred inflation measure is below target and trending down. But where that argument fails, perhaps a credibility/communications argument can succeed?
Plosser is careful to add the now required "not tightening" clause:
I want to emphasize that in this state-contingent framework, reducing the pace or even ending asset purchases need not be the start of an exit strategy or more aggressive tightening. Nor would it indicate that an increase in the policy rate was imminent. Instead, these actions would slow and then halt efforts to continuously expand the level of accommodation by increasing the size of the balance sheet. Given the improving economy, dialing back asset purchases is an appropriate response.
I imagine we will see something like this in every speech going forward. Policymakers do not want market participants to jump to conclusions on the basis of any one policy move.
Bottom Line: While the Fed is moving closer to tapering asset purchases, timing remains an issue. I think that most policymakers will not be swayed to an early end by the "Fed's inflation credibility is at risk" argument. But a subset is likely swayed by the "financial stability is at risk" argument. And another subset may be swayed by the "communications credibility is at risk argument" that is an element of Plosser's speech. In short, the majority favoring continuing asset purchases at the current pace is obviously shrinking. Hopefully this week's upcoming speech by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and the release of the minutes from the last FOMC meeting will help clarify how quickly that majority is loosing ground.

Averages Continue To Seek New High Ground With HFT help

From Economic Intersection

Averages Continue To Seek New High Ground With HFT help:
Midday Market Commentary For 05-14-2013
By noon the DOW, SP500, SPR, $RUT and several others have made new historical highs on low to moderate volume. I would have thought if this was such a bull market we would start to see much heavier volume to commensurate the market's rise but that is not to be. As the markets continue to rise my proprietary indicators proceed to slide to the negative side after each sessions rise.
By 12:30 the markets continue to move upward on falling volume, suspect HFT computers are fudging the numbers a bit.

$INDU--TOP


Visit StockCharts.com to see more great charts.
$UGAZ closed up today 6.43%--INDL up 3.78%--DUST up 3.46%--TMV up 3.27%--DSLV up 3.27%--NRGY (A new ETF we are following) up 2.4%--YINN up .72%--EEM up .46%--BWP up .52%--EPP up .1%.

TECS closed down today 1.06%--TVIX down 1.19%--DRV down 1.37%--EWV down 1.54%--TZA down 3.84%--FAZ down 4.63%.

Once again, for a bear at an all time high, our portfolio continues to make more money than we are losing.  Still believe top is now.  Precious metals still going down, natural gas still going up, Asia--sans Japan--getting ready to take off, housing going lower, many banks are going to fail, and of course Japan--sayonara.
 

Bulls Bet Big

From ETF Daily News
by Michael Lombardi

Investors are taking much higher risks. Let’s look at the margin debt at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), for example. In March, it reached $379.5 billion, 28% higher than last year at this time. In March of 2012, the margin debt on the NYSE was $295.9 billion. (Source: New York Stock Exchange web site, last accessed May 10, 2013.)

Margin debt on the NYSE is very close to what it was prior to the broad market sell-off in the key stock indices during the financial crisis.

Increased margin debt means that even a minute fluctuation in the key stock indices could turn into panic selling, as a fall in stock prices will cause investors to close their positions to meet brokers’ margin requirements.

With the key stock indices posting new highs on a regular basis, it is certainly tough to be a bear, but I am sticking with my opinion. The fundamentals that drive the key stock indices higher—corporate earnings and sales growth, consumer demand and better economic conditions—are just not present. And there is far too much optimism in the marketplace—a classic trap for investors.

Tepper Top

$UGAZ is up 5.54%--INDL up 3.68%--DSLV up 2.91%--DUST up 2.4%--TMV up 1.85%--EEM up .57%--BWP up .16%--not bad for a bear at the top.

Visit StockCharts.com to see more great charts.

Who wants out?


Visit StockCharts.com to see more great charts.

Interest rates rise

Is this in Benny's plan?

Visit StockCharts.com to see more great charts.

$INDU--TOP


Visit StockCharts.com to see more great charts.

No disappointment from Tepper

8:03 AM More from Tepper: "We're going to get this hyper-drive market," unless the Fed starts tapering its purchases, he says (referencing 1999), adding the June meeting wouldn't be a bad time to get started. He pulls out this chart from a recent FRBNY report, showing stocks remain cheap - the equity premium to bonds is as high as it's been in the last 50 years.

Where's the positive volume?

$UGAZ opened up 5.17%--DSLV up .86%--INDL up 2.63%--EEM up .49%--BWP up .49%.  DUST is down--I'd buy more.  And once again--looking for a top today.  Best of luck.

Visit StockCharts.com to see more great charts.

Monday, May 13, 2013

Meanwhile, In Argentina

From Zero Hedge

Meanwhile, In Argentina:
It seems that bubbles can pop? No matter how much a nation tries to destroy its economy, raise its inflation, and devalue its currency - equity market corrections occur... Argentina's MERVAL index (among the best performing equity markets of Q1) is now down 12% in the last 4 days (since we discussed this tongue-in-cheek comparison to Japan) - that is an annualized rate of loss of 100%... Of course, if you were to ask the Argentinian politicians, this drop is actually a rise - and we note that the official (and unofficial) exchange rate has not budged during the last few days.



As the world stays with the Nikkei...


Charts: Bloomberg

    


Don't worry.

HUSSMAN: Recklessness, Euphoria, And Superstition Have Been Rewarded Like Insight And Genius
Mamta Badkar May 13, 2013, 4:51 PM

John Hussman: Recklessness And Crowd Following Has Been Rewarded But Retaining This Windfall Will Be Difficult (Advisor Perspectives)

John Hussman at Hussman Funds writes that the average bear market fall can erase over 50% of the previous bull market's advance. He thinks that is true this time around as well. He expects nominal S&P 500 return of 3.2% annually in the next 10 years.

"The perception that investors are “forced” to hold stocks is driven by a growing inattention to risk. But Investors are not simply choosing between a 3.2% prospective 10-year return in stocks versus a zero return on cash. They are also choosing between an exposure to 30-50% interim losses in stocks versus an exposure to zero loss in cash.

"…Think about that. One literally could have sat in Treasury bills through 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and into early 2009, and have done better than the S&P 500 did over that entire span of time. Moderate losses are frustrating, but deep, major losses from rich valuations are the ones that matter, because it is difficult to recover from them in a durable way. The recent advance is a gift in that regard. Consider that carefully now, not later.

"…There will be opportunities to take constructive investment positions, certainly at the completion of the present market cycle, but most likely even in the event that the advancing portion of this cycle continues. Choosing those points, based on demonstrable evidence, is essential. Recklessness, crowd-following, euphoria, fear of missed gains, and monetary superstition has certainly been rewarded lately, in a way that seems indistinguishable from insight and genius. Retaining such windfalls will prove far more difficult."

92% Of Investors Expect A Great Summer (Bank of America)

A new investor poll from BAML shows that only 8% of investors think we will see another 'sell in May and go away.' "Only 8% of investors believe that we are at risk of seeing markets repeat the pattern of 2012 and 2011 with significant risk-off episodes in the summer following data weakness in the spring." Moreover, most surveyed did not seem worried about a rise in bond yields.

Does volume precede price?

With Daily Sentiment Index at 92 and Market Vane at 69 you'd think Nasdaq 100 up volume number would be higher--the stealth bull market goes higher!  Even Benny, the Put, might be wrapping up.  This market can walk on its own--what did I miss?  The silver/gold ratio and the NASDAQ 100/DJI ratio are signaling flight from risk, aren't they?  Tepper will be on CNBC tomorrow morning explaining to us dopes why this market has more to go.  Yamada is all in.  Merrill Lynch junk bonds hitting new lows.  What me worry.  Barron's Big Money poll--they're all in.  Who's left?

$DUST closed up 7.49% today (And going much higher)--TMV up 2.25% (And going much higher)--DSLV up 2.18% (And going much higher)--TECS up 1.01%--UGAZ up .98% (And going much higher)--I am adding a new ETF tonight--BWP (Has 6.95% dividend, but went ex-dividend May 5) up .96%--TZA up .15%.

$EPP closed down today .51%--FAZ closed down .79%--EEM down .92%--DRV down 1.19%--TVIX down 1.47%--EWV down 2.56%--YINN down 3.2%--INDL down 5.7%.

Asia has two temporary problems: A raging Japan and poor numbers out of China. Both of these we reverse soon. Japan will be hauled off to asylum and China will eat Japan's lunch.

All things equal, we are making more money than losing--wait till we get this thing cranking down.

Best of luck.

The Fed Signals the Music Will Stop Before 2014

From Zero Hedge

The Fed Signals the Music Will Stop Before 2014:

After the market’s close on Friday, Jon Hilsenrath at the Wall Street Journal released an article implying that the Fed might remove or reduce its QE programs before the year end.

The reason this matters is because Hilsenrath is thought to be an unofficial mouthpiece for the Fed. Time and again he’s released articles hinting at the Fed’s future policies in advance. And many believe senior Fed officials such as Bernanke will personally leak ideas to him to test the public’s response to said ideas in advance.

So many believe that Hilsenrath’s Friday article was indeed the Fed preparing the markets for a tapering or removal of QE before the year end. Given that the entire US market is moving lockstep with Fed activity (the Fed’s balance sheet has literally reflated the NYSE tick for tick post 2009) this is a huge deal.

This supports our view that the Fed is aware stocks are in a bubble and is attempting to prep the market in advance for less liquidity.

Since QE 2, the negative effects of QE (higher costs of living) have outweighed the positive effects (higher stock prices) by a wide margin. Only 52% of US households own stocks… but everyone is paying for higher food and higher energy prices.

On a deeper level, QE is a drug for the market. There is no evidence in history that QE creates jobs or growth Both Japan and the UK have launched QE equal to over 20% of their GDP, neither have experienced a significant pickup in jobs or GDP growth as a result.

So QE was always about one thing only: pushing the market higher. But now the market is completely detached from economic realities. There is a word for this… it’s “bubble.”

The Fed knows this and is now trying to prepare the market for withdrawal. But the market is on total life support from the Fed. Take away the Fed punchbowl and the party stops.

Between this, rampant insider selling (makes you wonder if the people running the companies know something about the economy the Fed is ignoring), the downturn in economic data in the US, and the ongoing disaster that is the US jobs market, the market is priced for a total collapse.

For more market commentary and investment insights www.gainspainscapital.com

Best Regards,
Graham Summers

    


How much does FED spend every month on mortgage securities?

Housing Headlines Mask Unsettling Trends
Posted to: MND NewsWire
Monday, May 13, 2013 10:35 AM

Forward this email: Send a copy of this story to someone you know that may want to read it.

The report points out, "It is hard to imagine a sustainable housing recovery taking place with fewer homeowners." This point, it says, "appears to be lost in all of the celebration over soaring home prices and bidding wars for the scarce inventory of homes currently available for sale." It is important to balance enthusiasm over soaring prices with the knowledge that most of the housing market is still healing and the sharp increases in prices driven partially by both individual and investor purchasing. In contrast to prices, home sales are following a more modest trajectory, one in line with mortgage purchase applications.

One point which tends to be overlooked, the report says, is that a full-fledged housing recovery will require a normally functioning mortgage market and we are nowhere close to one. The Federal Reserve is buying $40 billion in mortgage securities every month

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Saxo Bank CEO On The 'Eurozone Minefield': "This Crisis Will Not Pass"

From Zero Hedge

Saxo Bank CEO On The 'Eurozone Minefield': "This Crisis Will Not Pass":
Niall Ferguson recently remarked, "[Europe] is a politicial experiment gone wrong. The experiment was to see if Europeans could be forced into an even closer union - despite their wishes - by economic means, because the political means failed." In this brief clip, Lars Seier Christensen, co-CEO and co-founder of Saxo Bank, tells an audience at the Saxo #FXDebates in London that the eurozone will eventually break up as Brussels claims even more power from nation states. He warns investors that Cyprus was indeed a template for bail ins and that outright confiscatory wealth taxes, disguised as solidarity payments, could be used to raise funds. "The governments of Europe need money, and the private sector has it. It is as simple as that. Be very paranoid," he said, warning investors that the mattress may be a safer place to deposit money over the weekend than their bank accounts. "Frankly, it is a complete mess. And it is a mess that gets worse and worse every day," is how the outspoken truthiness begins, adding, "anyone with a rational view of the world now sees the currency collaboration as a historic failure that can lead to even further fatal consequences for Europe and the continent’s competitiveness vis-à-vis the rest of the world."

Via TradingFloor.com, Full Transcript
...let us turn to the situation in the Eurozone

Frankly, it is a complete mess. And it is a mess that gets worse and worse every day. Only not in Brussels. There we hear an endless litany of promises of recovery in six months time, always in six months time, we hear the Euro is safe, and that if just we all hand over more responsibility to our Masters in Brussels, everything will be just fine.

Nothing could be further from the truth. We have just been through the bailout of the fifth Euro zone country, and both Slovenia and Malta are queuing up to be next. When, not IF, the Troika arrive in these two countries, it will create to an absurd situation where nearly half of the Eurozone countries have been broken by their adoption of the common currency, the same EURO they joined with such high hopes for the future.

Now these are small countries, and can be treated as such…  just look what happened to Cyprus. I would suggest to Malta, Slovenia and other bailout candidates that they hang on for dear life until after the German election. After Cyprus, we now know what happens if you get in the way of a German leader seeking reelection.

What is it that is going so wrong in the Eurozone? I think we all know very well by now. The Euro is a political construct, and it simply has no sound economic or fiscal foundation. Unless that is put in place, the Euro will be doomed eventually.

The political capital invested in Euro is gigantic, so the will to keep it alive for absolutely as long as humanly possible, should never be underestimated. Every tool in the box - and I seriously mean EVERY single tool in the box- will be tried, before the unelected, unaccountable people in Bruxelles capitulate to reality. But doomed it is, the Euro, be in no doubt about it.

Actually, a lot of people knew this already when the Euro was introduced. Saxo Bank's chief economist, Steen Jakobsen, that did work related to the Delors commission back in the nineties, has often told me that the dangers playing out now, were openly discussed at the time. But the political pressure to move forward back then was relentless, and the momentum in the EU seemed so strong, that it was expected by many that the foundation could be put in place after the house was built.

Not so. Because during the first decade of the Euro, it became clear that the suggested benefits from the Euro never materialised. There was no strengthening of Europes clout in the world, there was no discipline among the members, there were serious issues beginning to show for the weaker countries that could not keep up with Germany when it came to competitiveness and productivity. There was no way to manage the economy without controlling your own short term interest rates. There was no way to devaluate your currency to create renewed equilibrium and ability to compete. There was no long term beneficial impact on long term interest rates, as the big winners from the Eurozone, Germany could and would not sell to their citizens that they should underwrite a common Eurobond, or make large transfer payments to the weaker countries forever.

And now, there is no way that the European populations are willing to move forward with the necessary further integration. Not that they get asked directly a lot,as almost all decisions are made by their parliaments or in Bruxelles behind closed doors, because no one dares to ask their populations via a referendum - they know the answer would be a resounding NO! And a NO it should rightly be, because Europe is not, and will never be, the United States. Our cultures, our economies, our populations are far too diverse to ever integrate efficiently and happily in a forced union.

Instead, integration is brought in via the back door, via contributions to the bailout mechanism, by corruption of the ECBs balance sheet, by the banking union that would destroy the credibility of even sound banks if fully implemented, by passing treaty changes quickly and uninformed via the parliaments, claiming that representational democracy justifies that. Well, it doesn't. A parliament that gives up national sovereignty knowing full well that their population would reject it, are committing treason, in my view.

But one thing is politics, another is economics, although it gets harder and harder to tell the two apart.

Anyone with a rational view of the world now sees the currency collaboration as a historic failure that can lead to even further fatal consequences for Europe and the continent’s competitiveness vis-à-vis the rest of the world.

In my view, there are a number of things that are very clear. The Eurozone will eventually break up. It could happen in a multitude of different ways.

The weaker countries could leave. If this process was managed in an orderly fashion, it could be done at lower costs than the current and future bailouts, and it would quickly set the exiting countries back on a recovery course.

Germany could leave. As the sole beneficiary of the Eurozone until now, this is not likely to happen anytime soon, but as the bills begin to pile up even higher, that may all of a sudden seems an attractive solution to the German citizens. Of course, this would mean a much higher German exchange rate, but with the pressure off for a while, it would reduce the urgency of the crisis for the remaining 16 countries, that would experience a growth boost from a significantly, but not catastrophically lower Euro rate.

A multi-currency zone could evolve, with countries with more similar economic conditions and objective could group together and achieve more appropriate currency levels.

But all of these scenarios would require rationality returning to Bruxelles. It could be certainly be achieved with less chaos and less economic mayhem than what otherwise awaits the Eurozone.

This could even secure attractive outcome of an EU returning to focus on a common market, reducing trade friction between the economies, and benefit from the big diversity of different competences across Europe – we have the benefit of both highly educated workforces and low cost industrial workers,  more than 500m consumers, and the benefit of competing tax and social welfare systems.

Again, I repeat, all of this requires rationality to return to the Eurozone.  And frankly, this does not seem to be on the cards, unfortunately.

If rationality does not return, what can we expect…

In my view, recession will continue for years, and even turn into depression. Forget about recovery in six months, it will always be six months from now.

Euro denominated  assets will remain unattractive, and downright dangerous, to hold for years to come.

Bond yields will rise substantially, in all the 17 countries as the unsustainability of the situation becomes ever clearer.

Bruxelles will claim ever more power, and use it ever more poorly. The financial sector will be drowned in self defeating regulation, taxes and cross border responsibility for failing banks, that will eventually destroy also the healthy banks.

Cyprus WAS a template. Expect not only bail ins, which if defined clearly ahead of time could be part of the solution, but also outright confiscatory wealth taxes, disguised as solidarity payments. The governments of Europe need money, and the private sector has it. It is as simple as that. Be very paranoid.

Expect latent surprises in the Eurozone minefield. The Cyprus chaos has ensured this. A normal private depositor that has worked hard to save up for his family, will not move his account to Switzerland or Singapore. But what will he do when his country is having a bailout over the weekend? I would say the mattress will look a safer place than his bank over that weekend. So bank runs could start instantaneously.

Of course, the answer to bank runs is capital restrictions. Expect a lot more of that, always introduces as short term and temporary, but very hard to remove once in place. Iceland is in its 5th year of “temporary” capital restriction – just for your reference.

There are a lot of things to worry and think about if you are a citizen or investor in the Eurozone.

...

This crisis will not pass.

    


German Export Machine Hits Skids; Imbalances Intensify: Exports Drop 4.2% YoY, Imports Drop 6.9% YoY

From Mish

German Export Machine Hits Skids; Imbalances Intensify: Exports Drop 4.2% YoY, Imports Drop 6.9% YoY: Eurozone imbalances continue to grow even as German exports slump. Why? German imports slumped even more, and the German current account surplus grew.

Via Mish-Modified Google Translate from Les Echos, please consider Germany's Export Machine Slumps in March.
The German trade surplus grew in March for the third consecutive month in raw data (to € 18.8 billion after € 16.8 billion in February) detailed figures released Friday, yet the report shows much weakness.

First, calculated seasonally adjusted data, the trade surplus fell slightly on a month to € 17.6 billion after € 17.7 billion in February.

Then, based on gross figures published by the Federal Statistics Office, both imports (€ 75.8 billion) and exports (€ 94.6 billion) increased compared with February, annual rate the situation is quite different.

In one year, exports fell 4.2% after a decline of 2.8% yoy in February. As for imports, their decline is stronger and reached 6.9% compared to March 2012.

 In one year, German exports to the euro area fell by 7%, while their decline was limited to 2.2% to European countries outside the euro area and 2.6% to non-European countries.
All of the alleged eurozone austerity (there really isn't much austerity as it's mostly tax hikes instead of spending cuts), has not fixed any imbalances.

Germany's trade surplus managed to grow even with a collapse in German exports. Yet, Germany is slowing rapidly along with the rest of Europe.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com   

Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

Expect a Spike in Long-Term Japanese Interest Rates; Currency Crisis Just Around the Corner

From Mish

Expect a Spike in Long-Term Japanese Interest Rates; Currency Crisis Just Around the Corner: I expect a spike sometime in the near future in long-term Japanese interest rates. People have been saying this for years, but the time may finally be at hand.

The following headline is what tipped me off: BOJ chief expects no spike in long-term Japan interest rates.
Japanese long-term interest rates should not shoot higher as a result of money flowing out of government bonds, Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda said on Saturday.

Kuroda added, however, that it would be natural for long-term rates to rise over time if Japan meets its goal of pushing inflation up towards two percent.

He said a shift in funds from Japanese government bonds to stocks and into lending was already taking place but that the BOJ was increasing its balance of JGB holdings at an annual pace of 50 trillion yen.

"The BOJ dealt with short-term volatility in bond prices by adjusting its market operations," Kuroda told reporters after a two-day meeting of G7 finance officials.

"I do not expect a sudden spike in long-term bond yields. In the long-run, if the economy recovers and inflation heads towards two percent, we might see nominal interest rates rise but that's natural."
Currency Crisis Just Around the Corner

When Japanese inflation spikes higher (and it will), the only way the Bank of Japan will be able to suppress long-term rates is to buy every long-term bond on the market.

A currency crisis in Japan is now just around the corner.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com  
Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

The coming blow off

Best ETFs For The Coming Blow Off Top
May 12 2013, 03:42 by: Wall Street Sector Selector | includes: DOG, DXD, FAZ, SH, SPY, TZA, XLF by John Nyaradi

At Wednesday's closing bell, the S&P 500 (NYSEARCA:SPY) and its related ETF were 157 points (or almost 11 percent) above its 200-day moving average. The only time we have seen a wider gap between the S&P's 200-day MA and its closing level was back in March of 2000, just before the dot-com crash. Will history repeat or only rhyme, and in Yogi Berra's famous words, "Are you ready for déjà vu all over again?"

The stock indices cannot keep going up forever (contrary to what you may have been told by your favorite television stock market commentator). At this point, multiple technical indicators are flashing warnings that markets are overbought and subject to a significant correction.